Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 18;17:345. doi: 10.1186/s12974-020-01971-6

Table 2.

Effects of Tat and morphine on microglial morphology in the striatum and spinal cord of Tat transgenic mice

CNS region Measure Genotype Repeated saline Repeated morphine Genotype effect Drug effect Genotype x drug
mean ± SEM mean ± SEM F1, 56 p F1, 56 p F1, 56 p
Striatum Soma area (μm2) Tat(−) 51.1 ± 2.16 46.7 ± 2.98 < 1.0 0.49 2.9 0.09 < 1.0 0.96
Tat(+) 49.2 ± 2.41 45.1 ± 2.00
Maximum branch length (μm) Tat(−) 35.3 ± 3.32 32.5 ± 2.59 < 1.0 0.59 < 1.0 0.84 1.7 0.20
Tat(+) 30.7 ± 1.90 34.4 ± 2.19
Critical radius (μm) Tat(−) 14.6 ± 1.56 13.4 ± 1.35 < 1.0 0.51 < 1.0 0.97 < 1.0 0.63
Tat(+) 14.4 ± 1.76 15.6 ± 1.20
Number of primary process Tat(−) 4.8 ± 0.56 4.1 ± 0.30 2.8 0.10 < 1.0 0.92 2.8 0.10
Tat(+) 3.5 ± 0.29 4.1 ± 0.45
Process maximum Tat(−) 6.8 ± 0.83 5.3 ± 0.60 < 1.0 0.93 < 1.0 0.70 2.3 0.13
Tat(+) 5.5 ± 1.00 6.4 ± 0.77
Process total Tat(−) 21.5 ± 3.02 16.1 ± 2.20 < 1.0 0.89 < 1.0 0.70 2.1 0.16
Tat(+) 16.9 ± 3.49 19.9 ± 2.77
Spinal cord Soma area (μm2) Tat(−) 48.5 ± 3.42 50.9 ± 3.79 4.2 0.04 3.8 0.06 1.5 0.23
Tat(+) 51.4 ± 2.45 62.2 ± 3.73
Maximum branch length (μm) Tat(−) 35.1 ± 2.59 36.2 ± 2.71 < 1.0 0.51 < 1.0 0.66 < 1.0 0.98
Tat(+) 33.4 ± 2.32 34.6 ± 2.19
Critical radius (μm) Tat(−) 16.7 ± 1.98 15.6 ± 1.20 < 1.0 0.44 < 1.0 0.98 < 1.0 0.61
Tat(+) 17.2 ± 2.28 18.1 ± 2.04
Number of primary process Tat(−) 2.3 ± 0.28 2.7 ± 0.33 < 1.0 0.81 1.5 0.23 5.0 0.03
Tat(+) 3.2 ± 0.47 2.0 ± 0.20
Process maximum Tat(−) 3.6 ± 0.31 4.6 ± 0.57 < 1.0 0.81 < 1.0 0.78 5.4 0.02
Tat(+) 4.8 ± 0.58 3.6 ± 0.27
Process total Tat(−) 11.5 ± 1.56 15.7 ± 2.30 < 1.0 0.58 < 1.0 0.95 5.1 0.03
Tat(+) 14.6 ± 1.75 10.6 ± 1.22

Sholl analysis of microglial morphology in the striatum and spinal cord of repeated (8-day) saline- or morphine-treated Tat(−) and Tat(+) mice. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. The parameters measured by Sholl analysis are indicated in parentheses in the second column. One-way ANOVAs for each CNS region were conducted with genotype and drug as between-subjects factors. F values and p values are presented from ANOVA results. Bolded values denote significant differences at α = 0.05; mean ± SEM, n = 3–4 mice per group/4 sections each