Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 17;12:174. doi: 10.1186/s13148-020-00968-5

Table 3.

Comparison of established protocols with the present study protocols in MGMT methylation analysis

Assay Target CpGs Strengths Weaknesses References

MSP

(qMSP)

DMR2 (CpG 71–86, 76–87)

Simple

Low cost

Unable to analyze heterogeneous methylation [12, 17]
PSQ DMR2 (CpG 74–78) High accuracy

High cost

Limitation of Amplicon length

[12, 23]
MS-HRM DMR2 (CpG 72–83, 72–89, 84–89) Capable of analyzing heterogeneous methylation

Low accuracy

Limitation of Amplicon length

[10, 12, 22]
HPLC

500 bp upstream of TSS (CpG 1–20)

DMR1 (CpG 22–59)

DMR2 (CpG 72–98)

Simple

Low cost

Capable of analyzing long amplicons

Unstable measurement of paraffin-embedded specimen Present study

CpG numbers on MGMT CpG islands were defined by Harris et al. [16]

DMR differentially methylated region, MSP methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction, PSQ pyrosequencing,

qMSP quantitative MSP, MS-HRM methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting analysis, TSS transcription start site