Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 18;40(47):8976–8993. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0247-20.2020

Table 2.

Passive membrane properties of retrogradely labeled corneal neurons

Membrane potential (mV) Rheobase (pA) Input resistance (MΩ) Mechanical threshold (µm) Current amplitude (pA/pF) Cell capacitance (pF)
WT RA −61.5 ± 1.4 (n = 75) 407 ± 36 (n = 45) 89.1 ± 9.8 (n = 71) 6 ± 0.3 (n = 75) 7.4 ± 1.4 (n = 75) 40 ± 2.6 (n = 75)
IA −65.7 ± 1.5 (n = 18) 486 ± 86 (n = 10) 88.5 ± 18.6 (n = 18) 6.6 ± 0.8 (n = 18) 6.7 ± 1.9 (n = 18) 43.7 ± 6.4 (n = 18)
SA −62.9 ± 1.7 (n = 22) 401 ± 59 (n = 15) 104 ± 23.5 (n = 22) 5.6 ± 0.6 (n = 22) 15.9 ± 3.8* (n = 22) 39.2 ± 5.8 (n = 22)
Piezo2cKO RA −58.4 ± 2.9 (n = 14) 401 ± 85 (n = 8) 56.1 ± 5.9 (n = 14) 3.9 ± 0.9# (n = 14) 5.8 ± 1.6 (n = 14) 39.9 ± 6 (n = 14)
IA −81.1 (n = 1) 322 (n = 1) 40 (n = 1) 11 (n = 1) 2.3 (n = 1) 21.3 (n = 1)
SA −60.8 ± 5.4 (n = 4) 355 (n = 1) 55.3 ± 12.6 (n = 4) 5.5 ± 1.5 (n = 4) 6.7 ± 3.8 (n = 4) 47.4 ± 12.5 (n = 4)

Electrical properties of mechanosensitive corneal neurons from wild-type and Piezo2cKO mice. Mean ± SE values are given for each parameter. Membrane potential values were adjusted for the calculated liquid junction potential of +12 mV. To compare the means of different parameters among the three types of MA cells, the Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA on ranks test and the Dunn's method one-way ANOVA test were used.

*Density of current in SA cells is significantly higher than in RA cells in wild-type mice (p = 0.037). To compare the means of different parameters for each type of cell between wild-type and Piezo2cKO mice, the Student's t test and Mann–Whitney rank-sum test were used.

#The mechanical threshold in RA cells from Piezo2cKO mice is lower than in RA cells from wild-type mice (p = 0.013). The absence of symbols indicates the lack of significant differences.