Table 4.
Odd ratios and 95% CIs for MetS and its components across tertiles of the MIND diet score
| MIND diet score | P value* | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 (< 6) (n = 294) | T2 (6.5–7.5) (n = 278) | T3 (8<) (n = 264) | ||
| OR (CI) | ||||
| MetS | ||||
| Crude | 1 | 0.94 (0.67–1.32) | 0.88 (0.62–1.24) | 0.77 |
| Model1 | 1 | 0.92 (0.64–1.33) | 0.83 (0.57–1.21) | 0.64 |
| Model2 | 1 | 0.91 (0.63–1.31) | 0.83 (0.57–1.20) | 0.63 |
| Model3 | 1 | 0.86 (0.55–1.16) | 0.80 (0.55–1.16) | 0.50 |
| Reduced serum HDL | ||||
| Crude | 1 | 0.60 (0.43–0.84) | 0.59 (0.42–0.83) | 0.002 |
| Model1 | 1 | 0.62 (0.43–0.89) | 0.59 (0.41–0.86) | 0.008 |
| Model2 | 1 | 0.62 (0.43–0.90) | 0.59 (0.41–0.86) | 0.009 |
| Model3 | 1 | 0.62 (0.43–0.89) | 0.59 (0.41–0.85) | 0.008 |
| Elevated BP | ||||
| Crude | 1 | 1.04 (0.74–1.47) | 0.91 (0.64–1.29) | 0.73 |
| Model1 | 1 | 0.85 (0.57–1.26) | 0.79 (0.53–1.19) | 0.51 |
| Model2 | 1 | 0.83 (0.56–1.24) | 0.79 (0.53–1.18) | 0.49 |
| Model3 | 1 | 0.79 (0.53–1.18) | 0.76 (0.51–1.15) | 0.37 |
| Elevated FBS | ||||
| Crude | 1 | 0.82 (0.59–1.14) | 1.04 (0.75–1.46) | 0.32 |
| Model1 | 1 | 0.80 (0.56–1.13) | 0.98 (0.69–1.38) | 0.40 |
| Model2 | 1 | 0.80 (0.56–1.13) | 0.98 (0.69–1.38) | 0.40 |
| Model3 | 1 | 0.79 (0.56–1.12) | 0.97 (0.68–1.37) | 0.37 |
| Increased serum TG | ||||
| Crude | 1 | 0.94 (0.67–1.32) | 1.02 (0.72–1.44) | 0.88 |
| Model1 | 1 | 0.97 (0.69–1.38) | 1.02 (0.72–1.44) | 0.97 |
| Model2 | 1 | 0.96 (0.68–1.36) | 1.01 (0.71–1.44) | 0.95 |
| Model3 | 1 | 0.97 (0.68–1.37) | 1.02 (0.72–1.45) | 0.96 |
| Abdominal obesity | ||||
| Crude | 1 | 1.30 (0.93–1.81) | 1.01 (0.72–1.41) | 0.21 |
| Model1 | 1 | 1.29 (0.88–1.88) | 0.93 (0.64–1.36) | 0.22 |
| Model2 | 1 | 1.27 (0.87–1.86) | 0.93 (0.63–1.36) | 0.25 |
| Model3 | 1 | 1.17 (0.78–1.76) | 0.84 (0.56–1.26) | 0.29 |
| General obesity | ||||
| Crude | 1 | 1.69 (1.17–2.44) | 1.24 (0.85–1.82) | 0.01 |
| Model1 | 1 | 1.71 (1.16–2.52) | 1.20 (0.80–1.79) | 0.02 |
| Model2 | 1 | 1.69 (1.14–2.49) | 1.19 (0.80–1.78) | 0.02 |
Data are presented as odds ratio (95% CI)
Model 1: adjusted for age, gender, marital status, physical activity, educations status, occupation and smoking
Model 2: additionally, adjusted for energy intake
Model 3: further adjustment was made for BMI
MIND diet score Mediterranean-DASH Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay, MetS metabolic syndrome, WC waist circumference, FBS fasting blood glucose, TG triglyceride, HDL high-density lipoprotein, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure
*Obtained by binary logistic regression