Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 18;20(2):971–995. doi: 10.1007/s11469-020-00421-x

Table 4.

Summary of hierarchical regression analyses for personality and mattering variables predicting automatic thoughts variables and loneliness (N = 462)

ATQ-negative ATQ-positive UCLA LATQ
B SE(B) β p < 95% CI B SE(B) β p < 95% CI B SE(B) β p < 95% CI B SE(B) β p < 95% CI
Step 1
  Dependency .21 .03 .32 .0001 [.16, .27] − .10 .03 − .16 .002 [− .16, − .04] .10 .02 .22 .0001 [.06, .15] .30 .03 .45 .0001 [.24, .37]
  Self-criticism .19 .03 .27 .0001 [.13, .24] − .11 .03 − .17 .0001 [− .17, − .05] .08 .02 .16 .001 [.03, .12] .11 .03 .16 .0001 [.05, .17]
  Self-esteem − .14 .02 − .26 .0001 [− .18, − .10] .16 .02 .32 .0001 [.11, .20] − .12 .02 − .32 .0001 [− .15, − .09] − .04 .02 − .08 .06 [− .09, .00]
  R2 .46 .26 .31 .35
  F for ΔR2 130.14*** 54.75*** 67.30*** 82.51***
Step 2
  Mattering − .21 .05 − .16 .0001 [− .32, − .11] .50 .05 .41 .0001 [.39, .61] − .36 .04 − .39 .0001 [− .43. -.29] − .20 .06 − .16 .001 [.32, − .09]
  Anti-mattering .21 .06 .17 .0001 [.10, .32] − .16 .06 − .14 .004 [− .27, − .05] .22 .04 .26 .0001 [.15, .29] .16 .06 .13 .01 [.04, .28]
  Fear of not mattering − .06 .05 − .06 .22 [− .15, .04] .03 .05 .03 .59 [− .07, .12] .07 .03 .10 .04 [.00, .13] − .00 .05 − .00 .97 [− .11, .10]
  R2 .51 .45 .58 .40
  F for ΔR2 16.74*** 49.81*** 96.19*** 11.30***
  Observed statistical power 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

ATQ Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire, UCLA UCLA Loneliness Scale, LATQ Loneliness Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire

***p < .0001