Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 18;20(2):971–995. doi: 10.1007/s11469-020-00421-x

Table 5.

Summary of hierarchical regression analyses for personality, mattering, and automatic thoughts variables and loneliness predicting adaptability (N = 462)

Adaptability
B SE(B) β p < 95% CI
Step 1
  Dependency − .19 .05 − .20 .0001 [− .28, − .09]
  Self-criticism − .17 .05 − .18 .0001 [− .26, − .08]
  Self-esteem .18 .03 .25 .0001 [.11, .24]
  R2 .25
  F for ΔR2 49.97***
Step 2
  Mattering .34 .09 .19 .0001 [.17, .52]
  Anti-mattering − .25 .09 − .15 .005 [− .43, − .08]
  Fear of not mattering .06 .08 .04 .46 [− .10, .21]
  R2 .31
  F for ΔR2 13.08***
Step 3
  ATQ-negative − .26 .08 − .19 .001 [− .41, − .11]
  ATQ-positive .45 .08 .31 .0001 [.30, .60]
  UCLA .11 .11 .06 .32 [− .11, .33]
  LATQ − .08 .07 − .06 .23 [− .22, .05]
  R2 .40
  F for ΔR2 17.81***
  Observed statistical power 1.0

ATQ Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire, UCLA UCLA Loneliness Scale, LATQ Loneliness Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire

***p < .0001