Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 18;20(2):971–995. doi: 10.1007/s11469-020-00421-x

Table 6.

Summary of hierarchical regression analyses for personality, mattering, automatic thoughts variables, and loneliness and adaptability predicting emotional experiences (N = 462)

Distress Negative mood Positive mood
B SE(B) β p < 95% CI B SE(B) β p < 95% CI B SE(B) β p < 95% CI
Step 1
  Dependency .48 .06 .35 .0001 [.35, .60] .38 .06 .30 .0001 [.25, .50] − .18 .06 − .16 .002 [− .29, − .07]
  Self-criticism .32 .06 .24 .0001 [.20, .44] .32 .06 .25 .0001 [.20, .44] − .28 .06 − .26 .0001 [− .39, − .18]
  Self-esteem − .14 .04 − .13 .002 [− .22, − .05] − .08 .04 − .08 .08 [− .17, .01] .15 .04 .18 .0001 [.08, .23]
  R2 .35 .27 .22
  F for ΔR2 83.12*** 57.68*** 43.69***
Step 2
  Mattering − .36 .12 − .14 .003 [− .60, − .12] − .16 .12 − .06 .20 [− .40, .08] .50 .11 .23 .0001 [.28, .71]
.29 .12 .12 .02 [.05, .54] .32 .12 .14 .01 [.08, .57] − .07 .11 − .03 .55 [− .29, .15]
  Fear of not mattering − .24 .11 − .12 .03 [− .45, .03] − .07 .11 − .04 .52 [− .28, .14] .06 .10 .04 .54 [− .13, .25]
  R2 .38 .30 .27
  F for ΔR2 7.72*** 4.57** 9.5***
Step 3
  ATQ-negative .56 .10 .28 .0001 [.35, .76] .32 .11 .17 .002 [.11, .53] − .04 .10 − .03 .65 [− .23, .15]
  ATQ-positive − .47 .10 − .22 .0001 [− .67, − .27] − .56 .10 − .28 .0001 [− .76, − .36] .64 .09 .37 .0001 [.46, .83]
  UCLA − .25 .15 − .09 .10 [− .54, .05] − .00 .15 − .00 .95 [− .31, .29] .11 .14 .05 .43 [− .16, .38]
  LATQ .23 .09 .11 .02 [.046, .41] .34 .09 .18 .0001 [.16, .52] − .26 .08 − .16 .002 [− .43, − .09]
  R2 .49 .40 .37
  F for ΔR2 22.54*** 19.97*** 17.16***
Step 4
  Adaptability − .31 .06 − .21 .0001 [− .43, − .19] − .28 .06 − .20 .0001 [− .40, − .15] .35 .06 .30 .000 [.24, .46]
  R2 .51 .43 .42
  F for ΔR2 24.92*** 19.32*** 40.32***
  Observed statistical power 1.0 1.0 1.0

ATQ Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire, UCLA UCLA Loneliness Scale, LATQ Loneliness Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire

**p < .01, ***p < .0001