Table 2. CFA testing factorial validity of PACES.
| Model | χ2 | df | p | CFI | RMSEA | AIC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | Model 1 | 1309.8 | 104 | < .01 | .856 | .116 | 1373.8 |
| Overall | Model 2 | 738.9 | 103 | < .01 | .923 | .084 | 804.9 |
| Overall | Model 3 | 455.7 | 83 | < .01 | .955 | .072 | 561.7 |
| Overall | Model 4 | 411.3 | 68 | < .01 | .959 | .076 | 547.4 |
| Overall | Model 5 | 129.2 | 48 | < .01 | .990 | .044 | 305.2 |
| Overall | Model 6 | 383.1 | 88 | < .01 | .964 | .063 | 479.1 |
| Overall | Model 7 | 691.3 | 97 | < .01 | .928 | .085 | 769.3 |
| Overall | Model 8 | 732.5 | 95 | < .01 | .923 | .089 | 814.5 |
| Overall | Model 9 | 184.5 | 62 | < .01 | .985 | .048 | 332.5 |
| Females | Model 5 | 97.8 | 48 | < .01 | .989 | .047 | 273.8 |
| Females | Model 6 | 280.7 | 88 | < .01 | .956 | .069 | 367.7 |
| Females | Model 9 | 129.6 | 62 | < .01 | .985 | .049 | 309.6 |
| Males | Model 5 | 116.0 | 48 | < .01 | .983 | .060 | 292.0 |
| Males | Model 6 | 220.3 | 88 | < .01 | .966 | .062 | 316.3 |
| Males | Model 9 | 131.2 | 61 | < .01 | .984 | .049 | 279.2 |
Note: χ2 = chi-square statistic; df = degrees of freedom, CFI = Comparative Fit Index; RMSEA = Root Mean Square of Approximation, AIC = Akaike Information Criterion.