Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 28;21(6):172–178. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.7.47486

Table 2.

Description of cases that POCUS may have contributed to the M&M.

Case Case description Ultrasound contribution Type of error

Incorrectly interpreted Incorrectly performed Incorrectly integrated
1 Possible septic shock with acute on chronic RV failure. Severe RV dysfunction correctly identified, however 4L of IVF given causing fluid overload. X
2 Hemothorax. Liver injury occurred during chest tube placement. Hemothorax correctly identified but ultrasound not used to guide chest tube placement. X X
3 Persistent tachycardia. PE not considered. RV dilatation correctly identified but not incorporated into care. X
4 Hemothorax after ultrasound-guided ipsilateral central line placement. Presumed vascular injury secondary to central venous access attempt. Unclear how procedure was done. X
5 Trauma with hypotension. +FAST correctly identified. No surgery consults until after CT. X
6 Leg infection treated as cellulitis as outpatient. Returned with necrotizing fasciitis. Ultrasound correctly identified soft tissue edema, but providers missed subcutaneous air, which was visible. X
7 Shortness of breath. Pleural and pericardial effusions identified, admitted. Pericardial effusion correctly identified, but not read as early tamponade delaying emergent consults. X
Total (8 errors/7cases) 25% (2/8) 25% (2/8) 50% (4/8)

M&M, morbidity and mortality; RV, right ventricle; IVF, intravenous fluid; PE, pulmonary embolism; FAST, focused assessment with sonography in trauma; CT, computed tomography.