Table 1.
Authors | Country | Study type | Intervention | Setting | Participants and databases | Analysis method |
Atherton et al, 2018 [24] | England and Scotland | Mixed methods case design | Alternatives to face-to-face consultations | General practices with varied experience of implementing alternatives to face-to-face consultations | Patients and practice staff | Descriptive statistics, multivariate analysis, and coding of qualitative data from EMIS Health |
Banks et al, 2018 [4] | West of England | Qualitative | eConsult | General practices that piloted an e-consultation system for 15 months during 2015 and 2016 | 23 semistructured interviews with staff members | Thematic analysis of interview data |
Cowie et al, 2018 [25] | Scotland | Mixed methods | eConsult | 11 general practices piloting eConsult | 44 semistructured practice staff interviews, 1 focus group (4 staff), and 291 patient survey responses | Health economics, thematic analysis and coding, patient survey, descriptive statistics |
Carter et al, 2018 [6] | South West England | Mixed methods | WebGP | 6 GP practices in Devon | Six practices provided consultations data; 20 GPs completed case reports (regarding 61 e-consults); 81 patients completed questionnaires; 5 GPs and 5 administrators were interviewed | Statistical analysis of surveys, thematic analysis of interview data |
Farr et al, 2018 [3] | South West England | Mixed methods | eConsult | 6 general practices | 23 practice staff interviews, patient survey data for 756 e-consultations from 36 practices | Economic analysis on usage and costs, Normalization Process Theory, inductive thematic analysis, patient survey and record data statistical analysis |
Ogden, 2018 [26] | N/Aa | Opinion piece | Online consulting | N/A | N/A | Descriptive statistics |
Marshall et al, 2018 [8] | N/A | Opinion piece | Online consulting | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Casey et al, 2017 [1] | N/A | Mixed methods case study | Online consultation system | Inner-city general practice | Information technology developers, clinicians, and administrative staff | Thematic and discourse analysis of interview data |
Edwards et al, 2017 [16] | South West of England | Observational study | eConsult | South West of England | eConsult data obtained from 36 general practices | Economic analysis, website analytics, survey-based statistical analysis |
Wise, 2017 [10] | N/A | Opinion piece | Online consultations | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Hanna et al, 2012 [27] | Scotland | Qualitative | Non–face-to-face consultations | Scotland | 20 semistructured interviews with general practitioners | Thematic analysis of interviews |
Mair et al, 2012 [28] | N/A | Systematic review | eHealth systems (only information pertaining to online consultations recorded) | N/A | MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library were searched for reviews published between January 1, 1995, and March 17, 2009. Studies had to be systematic reviews, narrative reviews, qualitative meta-syntheses or meta-ethnographies of eHealth implementation | Evidence synthesis |
Hanna et al, 2011 [15] | Scotland | Mixed methods | Non–face-to-face consultations | Scotland | 600 practice manager questionnaire responses, 20 practice manager interviews | Chi-squared test from a survey, thematic analysis of interviews |
aN/A: not applicable.