Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 5;7:577104. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.577104

Table 2.

Short-term outcome.

References Author (year) Patients alive at OA closure FC per protocol, %* Time to closure, days (median) Dressing changes, n (median) EAF (%)* Closure with mesh bridging (%) Closure with adjunct CS (%) Small fascial defect at closure (%)± Planned ventral hernia* In-hospital survival (%)*
(2) Petersson et al. (2007) 7 100 32 10 0 0 0 0 0 86
(9) Seternes et al. (2010) 8 100 10.5 3 0 0 0 0 0 66
(10) Acosta et al. (2011) 95 89.5 14 4 6.3 8.4 0 2.1 0 70
(14) Kleif et al. (2012) 14 50 10 4 0 0 0 0 50 87
(15) Rasilainen et al. (2012) 42 92.9 9 3.5 12 0 0 0 7.1 62
(16) Bjørsum-Meyer et al. (2013) 15 80 21 3 0 13.3 0 0 6.7 83
(13) Willms et al. (2015) 47 89.4 10 6.2 (mean) 1.8 0 0 0 10.6 87
(17) Beltzer et al. (2016) 31 61 6.5 55
(18) Kääriäinen et al. (2017) 30 83.3 20.6 (mean) 10 0 0 6.7
(19) Seternes et al. (2017) 84
(20) Tolonen et al. (2017) 36 83.3 7 2 7.3 0 8.3 2.8 5.6 71
(21) Käser et al. (2019) 31 58 5 42 0 0 0

FC, Facia closure; EAF, enteroatmospheric fistula; CS, component separation.

*

Outcome included in the pooled data presented in Table 4.

Closure with mesh bridging when fascial closure was not possible. Facial closure without mesh was achieved after component separation.

±

Fascial closure achieved in major part of the incision with smaller fascial defect remaining.