Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 18;70(3):593–606. doi: 10.1007/s12020-020-02478-z

Table 1.

Angiogenesis and clinical features in patients with PitNETs

MVD (number of vessels/HPF) TMVA (% vessel area/HPF) Perimeter (µm) Feret’s diameter (µm) Area per vessel (% vessel area/HPF) Roundness (0–1)
Gender
 Male (n = 16) 31.7 (20.0–39.7) 6.0 (4.9–8.8) 98.7 (86.1–117.1) 40.1 (35.4–47.2) 0.18 (0.15–0.28) 0.47 (0.43–0.53)
 Female (n = 8) 35.8 (20.7–64.2) 7.2 (3.9–14.3) 100.9 (83.9–113.1) 41.4 (34.0–46.0) 0.21 (0.14–0.28) 0.47 (0.46–0.48)
Headache at diagnosis
 Yes (n = 8) 31.8 (20.7–39.3) 5.2 (3.9–7.8) 98.2 (81.3–109.2) 39.5 (33.5–45.6) 0.18 (0.15–0.21) 0.46 (0.42–0.48)
 No (n = 16) 32.3 (20.0–51.4) 7.2 (5.1–9.4) 101.4 (86.6–117.9) 41.4 (35.4–47.2) 0.22 (0.16–0.29) 0.48 (0.45–0.51)
Visual impairment at diagnosis
 Yes (n = 13) 32.3 (20.0–55.3) 8.1 (5.5–9.6) 108.8 (93.3–116.7) 44.7 (37.9–46.9) 0.21 (0.16–0.27) 0.47 (0.43–0.51)
 No (n = 11) 31.0 (21.7–36.7) 5.4 (3.8–8.9) 97.9 (75.4–107.3) 38.5 (31.3–43.1) 0.18 (0.12–0.29) 0.47 (0.45–0.49)
Hypopituitarism at diagnosis
 Yes (n = 11) 36.7 (21.0–55.0) 8.6 (5.9–9.4) 99.5 (89.1–119.2) 40.6 (36.4–47.5) 0.22 (0.16–0.29) 0.47 (0.44–0.49)
 No (n = 13) 30.0 (20.0–35.8) 4.9 (3.9–7.9) 98.5 (74.5–110.4) 39.6 (30.3–46.4) 0.18 (0.13–0.26) 0.47 (0.43–0.53)
Cavernous sinus invasion
 Yes (n = 10) 28.3 (16.8–41.4) 6.1 (5.1–9.6) 100.9 (84.1–140.6) 40.6 (34.5–56.1) 0.24 (0.15–0.42) 0.47 (0.42–0.49)
 No (n = 14) 32.3 (27.5–44.3) 5.8 (4.2–9.0) 98.7 (83.7–110.1) 40.4 (34.6–45.7) 0.19 (0.15–0.22) 0.48 (0.44–0.53)
Ki-67
 <3% (n = 19) 32.3 (21.7–40.7) 5.9 (4.3–9.4) 97.9 (79.3–110.9) 39.5 (32.6–46.4) 0.17 (0.15–0.25) 0.48 (0.44–0.51)
 ≥ 3% (n = 5) 20.3 (17.2–63.8) 6.3 (4.7–14.4) 109.9 (100.7–138.8) 44.7 (41.4–57.3) 0.23 (0.21–0.35) 0.47 (0.37–0.48)
Trouillas classification grade
 1a (n = 11) 32.3 (29.7–40.7) 5.7 (4.3–8.6) 97.9 (73.5–108.8) 39.6 (29.3–45.5) 0.17 (0.15–0.22) 0.48 (0.44–0.53)
 1b (n = 3) 40.6 (20.3–.) 8.9 (3.9–.) 109.9 (97.9–.) 44.7 (40.2–.) 0.22 (0.19–.) 0.47 (0.41–.)
 2a (n = 8) 35.8 (18.4–50.9) 7.4 (4.5–9.8) 93.8 (80.9–132.7) 37.4 (33.2–51.8) 0.17 (0.14–0.40) 0.48 (0.44–0.49)
 2b (n = 2) 17.2 (15.3–.) 5.9 (5.6–.) 133.4 (103.3–.) 55.4 (42.7–.) 0.35 (0.29–.) 0.40 (0.33–.)
Re-operation
 Yes (n = 5) 40.7 (35.3–76.0)a 8.8 (5.9–11.6) 89.1 (72.2–97.9) 36.3 (28.2–40.4) 0.16 (0.13–0.21) 0.49 (0.48–0.53)a
 No (n = 19) 31.0 (19.7–36.7) 5.7 (4.3–9.4) 107.3 (87.1–119.2) 43.1 (36.4–47.5) 0.19 (0.15–0.29) 0.46 (0.43–0.49)

Microvessel density, total microvessel area and vascular architecture parameters among the cohort of 24 patients with pituitary neuroendocrine tumours (PitNETs) according to different clinico-pathological features. Data are shown as median (interquartile range). P values were non-significant for all comparisons

HPF high-power field, MVD microvessel density, TMVA total microvessel area

ap value comprised between 0.05 and 0.1 (Mann–Whitney U tests were used for all comparisons, except for the Trouillas classification grades where Kruskal–Wallis test was applied)