Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 18;11:5895. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17827-9

Table 1.

Age estimates for selected clades, obtained with different settings and datasets.

Setting/Dataset Holostei and Teleostei Cichlidae Cichlinae and Pseudocrenilabrinae
“permissive” gene set 269.6 (290.0–251.6) 76.2 (86.6–66.3) 62.1 (70.1–54.6)
“strict” gene set 269.2 (288.5–251.5) 76.9 (87.1–66.2) 62.2 (70.3–54.6)
MCMC sampling from prior 269.6 (290.9–251.5) 79.7 (94.9–63.9) 68.0 (81.3–55.1)
Without cichlid calibrations 268.9 (288.7–251.6) 61.2 (77.8–45.5) 38.7 (50.8–27.1)
Doubled net diversification rate 264.0 (277.5–251.4) 73.7 (83.6–64.2) 60.0 (66.9–53.3)
Halved net diversification rate 277.4 (306.7–251.9) 79.7 (90.8–69.4) 63.5 (72.5–55.0)
Doubled fossil sampling rate 263.5 (279.0–251.4) 73.7 (84.2–64.5) 59.9 (67.2–52.7)
Halved fossil sampling rate 277.9 (302.5–252.5) 81.3 (92.3–70.6) 65.3 (74.1–55.8)
(Osteoglossomorpha, Elopomorpha) 269.4 (289.5–251.5) 77.3 (88.1–67.9) 62.2 (70.3–54.9)
(Osteoglossomorpha, Clupeocephala) 269.2 (289.2–251.5) 76.7 (86.1–66.2) 62.0 (70.1–54.1)

Unless specified, the “strict” set of genes was used in all analyses. Mean estimates of crown ages in millions of years are given for the three clades, followed by 95% highest posterior density intervals in parentheses. Specified settings in the last two rows indicate monophyly constraints according to alternative relationships among Osteoglossomorpha, Elopomorpha, and Clupeocephala12, 14. The age estimates obtained with the “permissive” gene set correspond to those shown in Fig. 2.