Table 3.
Subgroup analysis of refractive prediction errors of the formulas compared by age.
| 75–84 | ≥85 | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BUII | |||
| MedAE (D) | 0.31 | 0.39 | 0.069 |
| MAE ± SD (D) | 0.36 ± 0.28 | 0.53 ± 0.45 | |
| % within ±0.25 D | 32.61% | 29.55% | 0.754 |
| % within ±0.50 D | 78.26% | 65.91% | 0.191 |
| % within ±1.00 D | 97.83% | 86.36% | 0.056 |
| Haigis | |||
| MedAE(D) | 0.34 | 0.42 | 0.024 |
| MAE ± SD (D) | 0.38 ± 0.30 | 0.60 ± 0.46 | |
| % within ±0.25 D | 41.30% | 25.00% | 0.101 |
| % within ±0.50 D | 76.09% | 54.55% | 0.032 |
| % within ±1.00 D | 95.65% | 77.27% | 0.010 |
| Hoffer Q | |||
| MedAE(D) | 0.31 | 0.49 | 0.053 |
| MAE ± SD (D) | 0.39 ± 0.32 | 0.60 ± 0.49 | |
| % within ±0.25 D | 43.48% | 31.82% | 0.254 |
| % within ±0.50 D | 71.74% | 50.00% | 0.034 |
| % within ±1.00 D | 95.65% | 84.09% | 0.087 |
| Holladay 1 | |||
| MedAE(D) | 0.30 | 0.45 | 0.026 |
| MAE ± SD (D) | 0.37 ± 0.30 | 0.58 ± 0.46 | |
| % within ±0.25 D | 43.48% | 22.73% | 0.037 |
| % within ±0.50 D | 65.22% | 52.27% | 0.212 |
| % within ±1.00 D | 97.83% | 81.82% | 0.014 |
| Kane | |||
| MedAE(D) | 0.32 | 0.42 | 0.055 |
| MAE ± SD (D) | 0.37 ± 0.27 | 0.56 ± 0.47 | |
| % within ±0.25 D | 45.65% | 27.27% | 0.070 |
| % within ±0.50 D | 82.61% | 61.36% | 0.024 |
| % within ±1.00 D | 95.65% | 84.09% | 0.087 |
| SRK/T | |||
| MedAE(D) | 0.28 | 0.46 | 0.058 |
| MAE ± SD (D) | 0.38 ± 0.31 | 0.57 ± 0.48 | |
| % within ±0.25 D | 43.48% | 20.45% | 0.019 |
| % within ±0.50 D | 65.22% | 56.82% | 0.414 |
| % within ±1.00 D | 95.65% | 81.82% | 0.047 |
BUII = Barrett Universal II, MedAE = median absolute prediction error, MAE = mean absolute prediction error.