Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 5;107(5):942–952. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.10.003

Table 2.

Logistic Regression Analysis of Clinician Perception of Change in Management and Clinical Utility of rWGS, rWES, and urWGS in NICU, PICU, and CVICU Infants

Independent Variable Description Odds Ratio (95% CI) p Value
Outcome: Change in Management

Test type rWES reference
rWGS 1.41 (0.65–3.1) 0.39
urWGS 2.37 (0.72–7.75) 0.15
Result type negative reference
positive 10.07 (4.74–22.35) <0.0001
Turnaround time days, accession to 1st report 0.92 (0.85–0.99) 0.03

Outcome: Clinical Utility

Test type rWES reference
rWGS 0.77 (0.38–1.57) 0.48
urWGS 1.79 (0.41–12.61) 0.48
Result type negative reference
positive 3.22 (0.98–14.71) 0.08
Change in management no reference
yes 6.69 (1.83–43.3) 0.01
Turnaround time days, accession to 1st report 0.98 (0.93–1.05) 0.59

CI, confidence intervals. Multiple logistic regression was used to evaluate which variables were associated with changes in management and clinician perception of clinical utility. Test type, result type, and turnaround time were included as predictor variables for both outcomes. Change in management was also included as a predictor variable in the model for clinical utility. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals are reported. A significance cutoff of α = 0.05 was used for all analyses. All analyses were conducted in R v.3.3.3.