Table 3.
Reported correlations between different methods of split renal function assessment
| Study | Year | N | Method 1 | Method 2 | Correlation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Piepsz et al. | 1978 | n=19 | Renal catheter | DTPA | 0.94 |
| Chanard et al. | 1982 | n=14 | Renal catheter | DTPA | 0.94 |
| Llams-Elvira et al. | 1989 | n=100 | MAG3 | DMSA | 0.97 |
| Bair et al. | 1995 | n=37 | MAG3 | DMSA | 0.82-0.99 |
| Ardela Díaz et al. | 2002 | n=138 | MAG3 | DMSA | 0.92-0.96 |
| Miyazaki et al. | 2010 | n=60 | DMSA | DTPA | 0.83 |
| Aktaş et al. | 2010 | n=19 | MAG3 | DMSA | 0.84 |
| Momin et al. | 2018 | n=50 | DMSA | DTPA | 0.99 |
| Present study | 2020 | n=97 | PSMA | MAG3 | 0.91 |