Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 15;10(5):240–251.

Table 6.

Comparison of results from index study with the published studies on utility of eltrombopag as second-line therapy in ITP

Study Tomas et al. 2015 (21) Eser et al. 2016 (20) Tomas et al. 2017 (32) Çekdemir et al. 2019 (31) Present study
Study design Retrospective Retrospective Retrospective Retrospective Retrospective
Number of patients (n) 152 31 220 285 53
Median age, years(range) 63 (45-75) 51 (33-59) 62 (47-75) 43.9 ± 20.6 35 (17-78)
Females, n (%) 109 (72%) 16 (51.6%) 47 (41.6%) 187 (65.6%) 23 (43.4%)
Duration of ITP, months (range) 81 (30-192) - 79 (31-193) - 2.06 year (32 days-14.23 year)
Median number of prior lines of therapy, n (range) 3 (2-4) 4 (3-5) 3 (2-4) - 3 (1-8)
Prior splenectomy, n (%) 104 (68%) 24 (77.4) 11 (11%) - 8 (15.09%)
Prior Rituximab, n (%) 17 (23%) 19 (61.3) 47 (30.7%) - 16 (30.19%)
Overall response, n (%) 135 (88.8%) 26 (83.9%) 127 (90%) 247 (86.7%) 81.1% (on day+90)
Median time to response 12 days (9-13) 16 days (8-28) 13 days (7-18) 14 days (3-210) 35 days (28-50)
Follow up Median 15 months 29 weeks (11-74) 15 months 18 ± 6.4 months Not reached
Sustained response 75.2% at 15 months - 71% -
    1-year 93.4%
    3-year 74.7%
    5-year 52.3%
All ADRs* 28 (18.4%) - 70 (31.8%) 62 (21.8%) 17 (32%)
ADRs ≥ gd3 2 (1.32%) One SCD** 15 (6.82%) 18 (6.3%) One SCD* 4 (7.55%)
*

ADRs: adverse drug reactions;

**

SCD, sudden cardiac death.