Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 15;1(6):1436–1443. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12259

TABLE 3.

Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and AUCs for different score cutoffs of the LOW‐HARM score

Cutoff Se,a % Sp, % PPV, % NPV, % AUC (95% CI)
0 100 0
5 99.5 64 73 99 0.82 (0.79–0.89)
10 99 78.5 82 99 0.89 (0.86–0.92)
15 96 81 83.5 95 0.89 (0.85–0.92)
20 92.5 85 86 92 0.89 (0.86–0.92)
25 91.5 89 90 91 0.90 (0.87–0.93)
30 85.5 89.5 89 86 0.87 (0.84–0.91)
35 82 92 91 84 0.87 (0.84–0.90)
40 82 92 91 84 0.87 (0.84–0.91)
45 77 94 93 80 0.86 (0.82–0.89)
50 75.5 94.5 93 79.5 0.85 (0.82–0.88)
55 69.5 95 93 76 0.82 (0.79–0.86)
60 68.5 95.5 94 75 0.82 (0.78–0.86)
65 63 97.5 96 72.5 0.80 (0.77–0.84)
70 58 98 97 70 0.78 (0.74–0.82)
75 57 98 96.5 69.5 0.78 (0.74–0.81)
80 51 99 98 67 0.75 (0.71–0.79)
85 43.5 99.5 99 64 0.72 (0.68–0.75)
90 35 99.5 99 60.5 0.67 (0.64–0.71)
95 23.5 100 100 56.5 0.62 (0.59–0.65)
100 0 100

AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; Se, sensitivity; Sp, specificity.

aPositivity defined as having a score above the cutoff value and dying.