Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 18;10:20132. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76887-5

Table 1.

The bacterial richness and diversity in tomato rhizosphere soil in different treatments at four growth stages.

Treatment* Diversity parameters# Coverage (%)
OTU number Chao Shannon
OS 7653C 13,497.02C 7.69A 92.05
aCK 10975aA 17,406.58aBC 7.97aA 94.72
bCK 8910bcA 16,548.22aA 7.72abA 92.38
cCK 9731abA 18,886.6aA 7.78abA 92.09
dCK 8528bcA 16,955.66aA 7.61bA 91.7
aT 10895aA 20,940.57aAB 7.66aB 93.78
bT 8086bcAB 14,313.52aA 7.61aA 92.96
cT 9855abA 22,902.03aA 7.75aA 90.85
dT 7062cB 12,415.59aA 7.46aB 92.74
aF 11844aA 23,370.35aA 7.82aAB 93.12
bF 7989bAB 14,612.8bA 7.39bB 93.6
cF 8153bA 16,784.45bA 7.48bA 92.27
dF 7523bAB 13486bA 7.56bAB 92.94
aTF 9435aB 17,431.7aBC 7.38aC 94.62
bTF 7539bB 14,232.18bA 7.33aB 93.47
cTF 7611bA 13,976.28bA 7.45aA 93.12
dTF 6631bB 12,219.68bA 7.296aC 93.30

*OS: original sample soil; CK: natural loam soil with tomato plant; T: soil + TOR3209 at the dose of 107 CFU/g; F: soil + 10% organic fertilizer; TF: T + 10% organic fertilizer; letters a, b, c, and d in front of each treatment represent seedling stage, flowering stage, early fruit setting, and late fruit setting, respectively.

#Different superscript small letters following each number indicate significant differences among the growth periods in the same treatment; the capital letters indicate significant differences among the treatments in the same growth stage. The comparison of OS and different treatment groups was at seedling stage.