Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 20;99(47):e23302. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023302

Table 2.

Baseline data of included studies.

Author Year HIV status Type of non-TB controls Technology (MIG) Antigen (MIG) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) AUC TP FP FN TN
Manngo PM[11] 2019 9 (8.65%) Other respiratory diseases Multiplex immunoassay Unstimulated 70 57 0.73 25 30 10 39
La Manna MP[12] 2018 None Other respiratory diseases Multiplex immunoassay Stimulated 94.44 90 0.8944 25 2 2 18
Jacobs R[13] 2016 14 (25.5%) Other respiratory diseases Multiplex immunoassay Unstimulated 68 88 0.81 15 4 7 29
Kim S[14] 2015 None Healthy controls RT-PCR Stimulated 85.71 86.21 - 24 4 4 25
Chung W[15] 2015 None Other respiratory diseases ELISA Unstimulated 81.1 88.5 0.89 163 6 38 46
Lee K[16] 2015 None Healthy controls ELISA Unstimulated 89.3 89.1 0.935 147 28 18 228
Chung WY[17] 2014 None Other respiratory diseases ELISA Stimulated 88.6 87.9 0.941 140 7 18 51
Wang X[18] 2012 None Healthy controls Microbead-based assay Stimulated 85.4 80.8 0.896 152 30 26 126

AUC = area under curve, ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, FN = false negative, FP = false positive, HIV = human immunodeficiency virus, RT-PCR = reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, TB = tuberculosis, TN = true negative, TP = true positive.