Table 8. Comparison of the proposed methodology.
Method | Feature Type | Classifier | Type | ACC (in %) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bipectrum [30] | HoS | SVM | NC | 93.26 |
PD | 83.71 | |||
KNN | NC | 91.51 | ||
PD | 81.31 | |||
BFC [28] | Bispectrum | SVM | NC | 66.8 |
PD | 52.97 | |||
NC | 71.79 | |||
PD | 51.66 | |||
Hybrid [34] | Bispectrum | SVM | NC | 74.31 |
PD | 72.96 | |||
Power Spectrum | SVM | NC | 68.19 | |
PD | 65.62 | |||
Wavelet Packet | SVM | NC | 63.96 | |
PD | 55.97 | |||
Non-linear | SVM | NC | 73.17 | |
PD | 67.61 | |||
RQA [5] | HoS | ELM | NC | 89.17 |
PD | 84.5 | |||
TQWT | Pw, Entropy, En and Vr | PNN | NC | 96.16 |
PD | 93.88 |