Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Crit Care Med. 2020 Oct;48(10):e916–e926. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004505

TABLE 2.

Evaluation of Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Sepsis Definitions Using the Angus Framework (7) for Development and Interpretation of Sepsis Definitions

Domain Definition Proxy Measure of This Domain in IPSO Definition Result (IPSO Sepsis) Result (IPSO Critical Sepsis) Definition Performance (Low, Medium, High)
1) Reliability: Criteria yield stable reproducible results
Test-retest When tests are repeated Median change in frequency from 2017 to 2018 (greater change = less reliability) Median increase 2.44 cases/1,000 admissions (IQR, 0.13–7.74) Median increase 0.70 cases/1,000 admissions (IQR, −0.68 to 1.87) Sepsis: Medium
Critical Sepsis: Medium to High
Inter-rater When tests are interpreted across different raters Among all hospitals, median frequency per 1,000 admissions (proxy for interrater reliability, greater IQR = less reliability) 20.4 cases/1,000 admissions (IQR, 9.1–29.3) 6.4 cases/1,000 admissions (IQR, 3.3–9.1) Sepsis: Medium
Critical Sepsis: Medium to High

2) Content validity
Content validity Criteria fit with current understanding and knowledge Qualitative subject matter expert review This definition implies clinically perceived sepsis based on treatment. This is useful for QI but is subject to limitations of inappropriate treatment; does not reflect all organ dysfunction This definition is similar to current understanding of shock/cardiovascular dysfunction but is also limited by being subject to the appropriateness of treatment High

3) Construct validity: Criteria measure what they purport to measure
Convergent The extent to which two or more aspects that should agree do agree (occur together) % of patients who have intensive care admission, positive-pressure ventilation, lactate ≥ 4 mmol/L, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation 74% (see Table 4 for details of each measure) 88% Medium to high

4) Criterion Validity: New criteria agree with existing standard
Concurrent Comparison to a current standard available at the same time Six hospitals with preexisting sepsis registries reported approximate percent of patients in registry also identified by IPSO definitions 80% (Additional detail in Supplemental Digital Content 2, http://links.lww.com/CCM/F681) Medium to high
Predictive Comparison to a later outcome believed to be strongly associated with the disease of interest Overall mortality

Sepsis-specific mortality
4.0%

2.5%
6.3%

3.7%
Medium to high
Similar to existing pediatric sepsis studies from emergency departments with QI (1215), lower than International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision coded hospital-wide sepsis mortality (17, 18)

5) Measurement burden: Burden to implement criteria
Lower cost Financial costs Qualitative subject matter expert review There was no direct clinical cost to the patient at bedside. Personnel needs were greatest in establishing data capture and diminished for maintenance. Typically needed at minimum a medical informaticist, a physician, a nurse, and process improvement specialist with a portion of time on this project Medium
Self-report of sites using manual abstraction Sites using manual data abstraction reported case ascertainment using the definition required 3–20 min per case
Greater safety Side effects, complications to patient Qualitative subject matter expert review Little to no direct safety concern. Loss of confidentiality is a theoretical risk, however, no data breaches occurred High
Lower complexity Difficulties executing the steps to obtain/interpret the measures Qualitative subject matter expert review Definition was complex to initially create in each hospital’s infrastructure, however, easier to routinely report
Definition was flexible to each hospital’s internal processes
Medium

6) Timeliness
Timeliness Speed with which criteria are generated with respect to the course of the disease Median (IQR) to first case submission
Median (IQR) to submission after first submission
15 mo (IQR, 13–18 mo)
44 d (IQR, 24–82 d)
Timeliness for first case identification: Low to medium
Median (IQR) to submission after 50% submission 31 d (IQR, 23–76 d)
Median (IQR) to submission after 80% submission 26 d (IQR, 23–56 d) Timeliness for ongoing submission: Medium

IPSO = Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes, IQR = interquartile range, QI = quality improvement.