TABLE 2.
Domain | Definition | Proxy Measure of This Domain in IPSO Definition | Result (IPSO Sepsis) | Result (IPSO Critical Sepsis) | Definition Performance (Low, Medium, High) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1) Reliability: Criteria yield stable reproducible results | |||||
Test-retest | When tests are repeated | Median change in frequency from 2017 to 2018 (greater change = less reliability) | Median increase 2.44 cases/1,000 admissions (IQR, 0.13–7.74) | Median increase 0.70 cases/1,000 admissions (IQR, −0.68 to 1.87) | Sepsis: Medium Critical Sepsis: Medium to High |
Inter-rater | When tests are interpreted across different raters | Among all hospitals, median frequency per 1,000 admissions (proxy for interrater reliability, greater IQR = less reliability) | 20.4 cases/1,000 admissions (IQR, 9.1–29.3) | 6.4 cases/1,000 admissions (IQR, 3.3–9.1) | Sepsis: Medium Critical Sepsis: Medium to High |
2) Content validity | |||||
Content validity | Criteria fit with current understanding and knowledge | Qualitative subject matter expert review | This definition implies clinically perceived sepsis based on treatment. This is useful for QI but is subject to limitations of inappropriate treatment; does not reflect all organ dysfunction | This definition is similar to current understanding of shock/cardiovascular dysfunction but is also limited by being subject to the appropriateness of treatment | High |
3) Construct validity: Criteria measure what they purport to measure | |||||
Convergent | The extent to which two or more aspects that should agree do agree (occur together) | % of patients who have intensive care admission, positive-pressure ventilation, lactate ≥ 4 mmol/L, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation | 74% (see Table 4 for details of each measure) | 88% | Medium to high |
4) Criterion Validity: New criteria agree with existing standard | |||||
Concurrent | Comparison to a current standard available at the same time | Six hospitals with preexisting sepsis registries reported approximate percent of patients in registry also identified by IPSO definitions | 80% (Additional detail in Supplemental Digital Content 2, http://links.lww.com/CCM/F681) | Medium to high | |
Predictive | Comparison to a later outcome believed to be strongly associated with the disease of interest | Overall mortality Sepsis-specific mortality |
4.0% 2.5% |
6.3% 3.7% |
Medium to high |
Similar to existing pediatric sepsis studies from emergency departments with QI (12–15), lower than International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision coded hospital-wide sepsis mortality (17, 18) | |||||
5) Measurement burden: Burden to implement criteria | |||||
Lower cost | Financial costs | Qualitative subject matter expert review | There was no direct clinical cost to the patient at bedside. Personnel needs were greatest in establishing data capture and diminished for maintenance. Typically needed at minimum a medical informaticist, a physician, a nurse, and process improvement specialist with a portion of time on this project | Medium | |
Self-report of sites using manual abstraction | Sites using manual data abstraction reported case ascertainment using the definition required 3–20 min per case | ||||
Greater safety | Side effects, complications to patient | Qualitative subject matter expert review | Little to no direct safety concern. Loss of confidentiality is a theoretical risk, however, no data breaches occurred | High | |
Lower complexity | Difficulties executing the steps to obtain/interpret the measures | Qualitative subject matter expert review | Definition was complex to initially create in each hospital’s infrastructure, however, easier to routinely report Definition was flexible to each hospital’s internal processes |
Medium | |
6) Timeliness | |||||
Timeliness | Speed with which criteria are generated with respect to the course of the disease | Median (IQR) to first case submission Median (IQR) to submission after first submission |
15 mo (IQR, 13–18 mo) 44 d (IQR, 24–82 d) |
Timeliness for first case identification: Low to medium | |
Median (IQR) to submission after 50% submission | 31 d (IQR, 23–76 d) | ||||
Median (IQR) to submission after 80% submission | 26 d (IQR, 23–56 d) | Timeliness for ongoing submission: Medium |
IPSO = Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes, IQR = interquartile range, QI = quality improvement.