Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 18.
Published in final edited form as: Bioconjug Chem. 2020 Oct 18;31(11):2564–2575. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00507

Table 1.

Comparison of the binding affinities of the cereblon ligands lenalidomide (1), thalidomide (4), and pomalidomide (8)

Assay condition Lenalidomide (1)
Thalidomide (4)
Pomalidomide (8)
IC50 Ki IC50 Ki IC50 Ki
TR-FRET assay with BODIPY FL Thalidomide (10) 8.9 nM 4.2 nM 22.4 nM 10.6 nM 6.4 nM 3.0 nM
FP assay with Cy5-conjugated thalidomide (7)10 296.9 nM 177.8 nM 404.6 nM 249.2 nM 264.8 nM
> 41- foldb
156.6 nM
TR-FRET assay with Cy5-conjugated cereblon modulator (compound 7) (9)11 1.5 μM NAa NA NA 1.2 μM
>187-foldb
NA
a

NA: not available.

b

Fold change sensitivity was calculated by dividing the IC50 value from the previously reported assay by the IC50 value of 6.4 nM obtained from the BODIPY FL Thalidomide (10)-mediated TR-FRET binding assay.