Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 6;11:528056. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.528056

Table 3.

Dental and oral health.

Parameter C (n = 42) S (n = 49) P (n = 8) Significant differences
C vs. S C vs. P S vs. P
Decayed/missing/filled teeth (DMFT)a [n] 23.5 (18; 26.3) 23 (17.5; 28) 25 (23.5; 27.8)
Decayed teetha [n] 0 (0; 0.3) 0 (0; 1) 0 (0; 4)
Root remantsa [n] 0 (0; 0) 0 (0; 0) 0 (0; 1.5)
Missing teetha [n] 9 (5.5; 16.5) 10 (6; 25) 22 (11.3; 25.8) 0.041
Restored teetha [n] 14 (9.5; 20) 11 (5; 17) 5 (0.3; 16.3)
Edentulous (full denture wearers)b yes 7.1% (3) 12.2% (6) 0% (0)
Regular recallb yes 78.6% (33) 73.5% (36) 62.5% (5)
APIa,* [%] 40 (19.4; 67.7) 62.5 (35.5; 100) 100 (66.1; 100) 0.014 0.004
PPDmaxa,# [mm] 4 (2; 6) 5 (2; 6) 3 (3; 7)

C, stroke mimics; S, stroke patients without pneumonia; P, stroke patients with pneumonia; API, approximal plaque index; PPDmax, maximum probing pocket depth.

Depiction of mediansa (first quartile; third quartile) or relative proportionsb (numbers of patients) and statistically significant differences from pairwise comparisons (Mann–Whitney U or χ2-tests, respectively; α = 0.05). For evaluation of the general influence of a given parameter among all groups, α was adjusted according to the error rates method to α*(3) = 0.01695243.

*

measured in 39, 43, and 8 patients from groups C, S, and P, respectively;

#measured in 39, 43, and 7 patients from groups C, S, and P, respectively; p-value, significant (p ≤ 0.05); –, not significant (p > 0.05).