Table 3.
Mortality in patients with oral SCC between the non-operative and operative treatment groups during the 5-year follow-up period (n = 358)
Univariate analysis | Multivariable analysis | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crude HR | 95% CI | P valuea | Adjusted HR | 95% CI | P valuea | |||||
Sex, male vs. female | 1.125 | 0.681 | – | 1.860 | 0.645 | 0.900 | 0.529 | – | 1.529 | 0.696 |
Age group, ≥85 years vs. <85 years | 1.529 | 0.612 | – | 3.821 | 0.364 | 1.172 | 0.395 | – | 3.482 | 0.775 |
Primary site, tongue vs. otherb | 1.015 | 0.622 | – | 1.658 | 0.951 | 1.478 | 0.888 | – | 2.460 | 0.133 |
T stage, T3 + T4a + T4b vs. Tis + T1 + T2 | 3.511 | 1.909 | – | 6.458 | < 0.001 | 1.410 | 0.439 | – | 4.525 | 0.564 |
N stage, N1 + N2a + N2b + N3a + N3b vs. N0 | 4.161 | 2.531 | – | 6.842 | < 0.001 | 2.660 | 1.417 | – | 4.991 | 0.002 |
Stage, stage3 + 4a + 4b + 4c vs stage0 + 1 + 2 | 4.201 | 2.139 | – | 8.252 | < 0.001 | 1.541 | 0.388 | – | 6.118 | 0.539 |
Treatment, operation vs non-operation | 0.183 | 0.108 | – | 0.310 | < 0.001 | 0.276 | 0.156 | – | 0.489 | < 0.001 |
SCC squamous cell carcinoma, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval
a A Cox proportional hazard model was constructed using the variables with a P value < 0.1 in Table 2. M stage was not included because the percentage of M1 in those aged <85 years was zero
b Other primary sites included the lower gingiva, upper gingiva, buccal mucosa, oral floor, lip, and palate