Table 4.
Correlation and agreement between optical coherence tomography and perimetric parameters in patients with high myopia
| Spearman’s rank correlation | Cross-classification (%) | Kappa analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | p | Same quartile | Adjacent quartile | Opposite quartile | Weight kappa | P value | |
| 10–2 SITA VS GCIPL | |||||||
| Superior temporal MS VS Inferior nasal GCIPL | 0.0474 | 0.8144 | 26 | 63 | 11 | 0.0505 | 0.9209 |
| Superior nasal MS VS Inferior temporal GCIPL | −0.0362 | 0.8577 | 11 | 70 | 19 | −0.1765 | 0.0926 |
| Inferior temporal MS VS Superior nasal GCIPL | 0.1102 | 0.5843 | 41 | 44 | 15 | 0.2041 | 0.0647 |
| Inferior nasal MS VS Superior temporal GCIPL | −0.3125 | 0.1125 | 15 | 74 | 11 | −0.1898 | 0.2144 |
| 30–2 SITA VS RNFL | |||||||
| Superior MS VS Inferior RNFL | 0.3077 | 0.1184 | 37 | 52 | 11 | 0.3061 | 0.1514 |
| Nasal MS VS Temporal RNFL | −0.0538 | 0.7898 | 22 | 63 | 15 | −0.0658 | 0.7415 |
| Inferior MS VS Superior RNFL | 0.0138 | 0.9457 | 15 | 70 | 15 | −0.0848 | 0.2170 |
| Temporal MS VS Nasal RNFL | −0.4100 | 0.0337* | 15 | 63 | 22 | −0.2656 | 0.2170 |
SITA Swedish interactive thresholding algorithms, GCIPL ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer, MS mean sensitivity, RNFL retinal nerve fiber layer
* statistically significant, P < 0.05