. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.

Published in final edited form as: Psycholog Relig Spiritual. 2019 Aug 15;12(3):261–268. doi: 10.1037/rel0000284

Table 3.

Multivariate Regression Analyses of Main Effects of Religious Coping Styles on Depressive Symptoms and Moderating Influences of Sexual Orientation and Gender

	Depressive Symptoms
Predictor	B (SE)	95% CI of B	ß
Model 1
Positive religious coping style	.00 (.02)	−.04 – .04	−.00
Negative religious coping style	.04 (.02)	.00 – .08	.12^*
Adjusted R²			.25
Model 2
Positive religious coping style	.07 (.04)	−.01 – .14	.20
Negative religious coping style	.06 (.04)	−.02 – .13	.16
Positive religious coping style X sexual orientation	−.11 (.05)	−.20 – −.02	−.23^**
Negative religious coping style X sexual orientation	.04 (.04)	−.04 – .12	.08
Positive religious coping style X gender	−.05 (.05)	−.15 – .05	−.08
Negative religious coping style X gender	−.07 (.04)	−.15 – .01	−.14
Adjusted R²			.28
∆ R²			.03

Note. N = 216. All models controlled for age, income, gender, sexual orientation, and social support.

p < .05.

^**

p < .01.