Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 17;8:e10367. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10367

Table 4. Symmetry of tooth agenesis patterns.

Comparison Symmetry I (%) Symmetry II (%)
No 3rd—Agenesis 26.7 46.8
Maxilla Right vs. left side 3rd—Agenesis 29.0 74.6
3rd—Control 8.6 60.5
No 3rd—Agenesis 30.0 43.8
Mandible Right vs. left side 3rd—Agenesis 29.0 71.0
3rd—Control 8.9 56.3
No 3rd—Agenesis 6.9 8.8
Left side Upper left vs. lower left 3rd—Agenesis 24.1 52.1
3rd—Control 6.6 41.7
No 3rd—Agenesis 7.9 9.8
Right side Upper right vs. lower right 3rd—Agenesis 24.4 56.5
3rd—Control 8.6 52.0
No 3rd—Agenesis 6.9 8.71
Crossed q1 vs. q3 Upper right vs. lower left 3rd—Agenesis 22.1 47.2
3rd—Control 6.6 37.7
No 3rd—Agenesis 7.6 9.5
Crossed q2 vs. q4 Upper left vs. lower right 3rd—Agenesis 24.4 54.8
3rd—Control 6.6 39.2

Note:

Symmetry I: percentage relative to the whole sample (n = 303) without considering the patterns of no missing teeth as symmetrical. Symmetry II: percentage relative to subsample of subjects with missing teeth in the respective area (i.e., maxilla, mandible etc.).