Skip to main content
. 2020 May 29;7(4):363–388. doi: 10.1080/23328940.2020.1769006

Table 1.

Comparison of internal temperature imaging methods

Method Absolute or Relative Thermometry Spatial Resolution Tissue Penetration Availability Cost Harm to Target Tissue Implementable using current clinical equipment Applicable for bedside use
MR Absolutea and Relativeb High High Widely High Heat Yes No
Ultrasonography Relative Moderate High Widely Moderate Heat Yesc and No Yes
Computed Tomography Relative High High Widely High Ionizing Radiation Yes No
Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Relative Moderate Low Moderately Moderate None Not available Yes
Microwave Radiometry Absolute Moderate Low Moderately Moderate None Not available Yes
Photoacoustic Thermometry Relative Moderate Low Moderately Moderate None Not available Yes

aSpectroscopy, Proton Density, and Temperature-Sensitive Contrast Agents.

bPRF, T1 relaxation time, T2 relaxation time, and Diffusion.

cFew clinical ultrasound systems allow implementation of thermography applications.