Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 20;15(11):e0242696. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242696

Table 3. Correlations between cingulum diffusion measures and verbal fluency score (IST) before (conventional DTI) and after FW-correction.

DTI
    IST 15s IST 30s IST 60s
    β R2 β R2 β R2
Model unadjusted for total WMH FA 0.015 0.001 0.047 0.002 0.067 0.004
MD -0.421* 0.17 -0.335* 0.12 -0.174 0.07
AD -0.186 0.036 -0.135 0.018 -0.060 0.004
RD -0.114 0.013 -0.128 0.016 -0.129 0.017
FW-corrected
    IST 15s IST 30s IST 60s
    β R2 β R2 β R2
Model unadjusted for total WMH FAt 0.047 0.003 0.098 0.01 0.095 0.009
MDt -0.443* 0.19 -0.361* 0.13 -0.226 0.08
ADt -0.198 0.04 -0.134 0.018 -0.061 0.004
RDt -0.293* 0.11 -0.248* 0.13 -0.199 0.039
FW -0.353* 0.12 -0.241* 0.10 -0.196 0.061

β, standardized coefficient regression adjusted for age and cingulum white matter volume

R2, R square value

* p < 0.05 FDR corrected