Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Land use policy. 2020 Sep 9;99:105024. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105024

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics of dependent variables on rural livelihoods (percentages).

Livelihood decisions Full sample (N=993) Lower wealth (N1=309) Medium wealth (N2=347) Higher wealth (N3=337) Mean difference between groups One-way ANOVA a

Mean Std. Dev. Mean Std. Dev. Mean Std. Dev. Mean Std. Dev. Lower vs. Medium Lower vs. Higher Medium vs. Higher Sig.
Labor allocation
On-farm work
 Agricultural work on own land 54.41 47.5 63.49 45.98 53.92 47.07 46.58 48.01 0.10*** 0.17*** 0.07** 0.000***
Off-farm work
 Local business 6.13 23.04 3.59 18.1 5.88 22.16 8.72 27.36 −2.29 −5.13*** −2.84 0.018**
 Local paid work 20.7 37.92 17.09 34.97 22.65 39.27 22.01 38.97 −5.57* −4.92* 0.65 0.127
 Out-migration employment 18.76 38.6 15.83 36.3 17.54 37.35 22.69 41.58 −1.72 −6.86** −5.15* 0.060*
Land Use
 Renting in land (net) 17.12 37.69 21.36 41.05 16.43 37.11 13.95 34.69 4.93* 7.41** 2.48 0.040**
 Stabilization 29.51 45.63 27.18 44.56 30.55 46.13 30.56 46.14 −3.36 −3.38 −0.02 0.560
 Renting out land (net) 19.03 39.28 14.89 35.65 18.16 38.60 23.74 42.61 −3.27 −8.85*** −5.58* 0.014**
 Abandonment 34.34 47.51 36.57 48.24 34.87 47.72 31.75 46.62 1.70 4.82 3.12 0.423

Note:

a

One-way ANOVA analysis for differences in means of livelihood decisions between groups at different wealth levels.

***

p<0.01

**

p<0.05

*

p<0.10, same in other tables and figures.