Table 4.
Variables | Category | Rural n (%) | Urban n (%) | Total n (%) | P- value∗ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Animal exposed | Cat | 19 (61.29) 9.22 |
12 (38.71) 24.00 |
31 (12.11) | 0.0242 |
Dog | 173 (82.78) 83.98 |
36 (17.22) 72.00 |
209 (81.64) | ||
Jackal | 8 (80.0) 3.88 |
2 (20.0) 4.88 |
10 (3.91) | ||
Mongoose | 6 (100) 2.91 |
0 (0.00) 0.00 |
6 (2.34) | ||
Type of animal | Community | 10 (66.67) 4.85 |
5 (33.33) 10.00 |
15 (5.86) | 0.4837 |
Pet | 6 (85.71) 2.91 |
1 (14.29) 2.00 |
7 (2.73) | ||
Stray | 176 (80.73) 85.44 |
42 (19.27) 84.00 |
218 (85.16) | ||
Wild | 14 (87.50) 6.80 |
2 (12.50) 4.00 |
16 (6.25) | ||
Fate of Animal |
Alive | 13 (81.25) 6.31 |
3 (18.75) 6.00 |
16 (6.25) | 0.2958 |
Dead | 11 (100.00) 5.34 |
0 (0.00) 0.00 |
11 (4.30) | ||
Killed | 38 (84.44) 18.45 |
7 (15.56) 14.00 |
45 (17.58) | ||
Not found |
144 (78.26) 69.90 |
40 (21.74) 80.00 |
184 (71.88) |
||
Total | 206 | 50 | 256 |
Multiple contingency analysis with α - level set as 0.05. The percentage of italics discretely represents the results within the rural and urban communities.