Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 16;13:1129–1137. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S262767

Table 2.

Factors Associated with Food Hygiene Practice Among University of Gondar Food Handlers, 2019 (n=394)

Variables Categories Practice COR (95% CI) AOR (95% CI)
Good (%) Poor (%)
Sex
Male 89(67.9%) 42(32.1%) 3.75(2.40,5.85) 2.37(1.34,4.19)***
Female 95(36.1%) 168(63.9%) 1 1
Age
19–26 41(38.0%) 67(62.0%) 1 1
27–28 44(47.8%) 48(52.2%) 1.50(0.85,2.63) 1.14(0.60,2.15)
29–32 65(56.0%) 51(44.0%) 2.08(1.22,3.56) 1.64(0.83,3.25)
33–58 34(43.6%) 44(56.4%) 1.26(0.70,2.28) 0.96(0.44,2.13)
Educational status
Primary 65(52.8%) 58(47.2%) 2.41(1.27,4.56) 2.54(1.16,5.58)*
Secondary 99(47.6%) 109(52.4%) 1.95(1.08,3.55) 2.20(1.11,4.37)*
College and above 20(31.7%) 43(68.3%) 1 1
Experience
≤2 89(42.2%) 122(57.8%) 1 1
>2 95(51.9%) 88(48.1%) 1.48(0.99,2.20) 1.86(1.06,3.25)*
Monthly income ETBa
1100–1743 49(36.0%) 87(64.0) 1 1
1744–2000 74(50.7%) 72(49.3%) 1.82(1.13,2.94) 1.69(0.97,2.94)
2001–2043 10(62.5%) 6(37.5%) 2.96(1.01,8.64) 2.11(0.60,7.39)
2044–4867 51(53.1%) 45(46.9%) 2.01(1.18,3.43) 2.05(1.01,4.16)*
Family size
1–2 54(47.8%) 59(52.2%) 1.55(0.82,2.92) 2.03(0.94,4.39)
2–3 45(44.1%) 57(55.9%) 1.34(0.70,2.56) 1.28(0.61,2.71)
3–4 62(53.0%) 55(47.0%) 1.91(1.02,3.60) 1.63(0.80,3.33)
4–9 23(37.1%) 39(62.9%) 1 1
Knowledge
Good 102(55.4) 142(67.6%) 0.60(0.40,0.90) 0.78(0.49,1.26)
Poor 82(44.6%) 68(32.4%) 1 1
Attitude
Good 112(51.9%) 104(48.1%) 1.58(1.06,2.37) 1.36(0.84,2.20)
Poor 72(40.4%) 106(59.6%) 1 1
Job category
Ticker/shift leader/manager 30(49.2%) 31(%) 1 1
Waiter 52(46.8%) 59(53.2%) 0.91(0.49,1.70) 0.73(0.33,1.63)
Cooker/baker/chef 50(32.7%) 103(67.3%) 0.50(0.27,0.92) 0.56(0.26,1.21)
Food hygiene orientation
Monthly 59(54.1%) 50(45.9%) 1.79(1.10,2.90) 1.24(0.70,2.21)
Biannually 57(50%) 57(50%) 1.52(0.94,2.44) 1.19(0.68,2.09)
Annually 68(39.8%) 103(60.2%) 1 1

Notes: *p<0.05, ***p<0.001 Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit 0.364, at approximately the rate of 1 USD = 27 ETB.