Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul;12(3):216–224. doi: 10.22122/ahj.v12i3.276

Table 4.

Comparison of salivary total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels in passive smokers and nonsmokers based on gender

Studied groups Salivary marker
Salivary TAC (µM) (mean ± SD) MDA (µM) (mean ± SD)
Case girls (n = 20) 0.66 ± 0.48 43.75 ± 66.61
Control girls (n = 20) 0.64 ± 0.71 131.15 ± 162.11
P 0.926 0.035
Case boys (n = 20) 1.27 ± 2.37 60.21 ± 108.01
Control boys (n = 20) 0.97 ± 1.17 165.16 ± 188.43
P 0.658 0.039
Control girls (n = 20) 0.64 ± 0.71 131.15 ± 162.11
Control boys (n = 20) 0.97 ± 1.17 165.16 ± 188.43
P 0.299 0.544
Case girls (n = 20) 0.66 ± 0.48 43.75 ± 66.61
Case boys (n = 20) 1.27 ± 2.73 60.21 ± 108.01
P 0.338 0.565

TAC: Total antioxidant capacity; MDA: Malondialdehyde; SD: Standard deviation