Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 7;25(6):e12771. doi: 10.1111/anec.12771

Table 3.

Univariable competing‐risk regression analysis for SCA

Variables HR (95%CI) P
Sex 0.444 (0.119–1.654) ns
Age 1.078 (0.961–1.209) ns
Smoking 0.230 (0.059–0.890) .033
Hypertension 0.576 (0.168–1.973) ns
Diabetes 0.729 (0.162–3.273) ns
eGFR 0.977 (0.955–0.999) .048
LVEF 0.972 (0.916–1.031) ns
Grace score 1.018 (0.995–1.043) ns
SDNN 0.967 (0.942–0.993) .012
VLF 0.998 (0.996–0.999) .027
DC 0.580 (0.445–0.754) <0.001
SDNN a 5.545 (1.474–20.861) .011
VLF a 13.650 (1.743–106.862) .013
DC a 8.580 (2.410–30.551) .001
DRs risk stratification 4.142 (2.554–6.717) <.001

Abbreviations: DC, deceleration capacity of heart rate; DRs, deceleration runs of heart rate; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ns, no significance; SDNN, standard deviation of normal to normal RR intervals; VLF, very low frequency.

a

Dichotomous variable: variables split by the cut‐off values.