Table. Patient Characteristics and Description of Facial Injuries Associated With Electric Scooters (e-Scooters).
Characteristic | No. (%)a |
---|---|
Patients | |
Female | 46 (37) |
Age, y | |
Mean (SD) | 32.5 (12.7) |
Median (range) | 30 (10-95) |
<18 | 3 (2.4) |
Pedestrian hit by an e-scooter | 2 (1.6) |
Alcohol consumption | 45 (49) |
Drug consumption | 5 (6) |
Speed at the time of the accidentb | |
Low or medium | 43 (49) |
High | 44 (51) |
Driving on the sidewalk at the time of the accident | 26 (31) |
Tandem riding | 12 (14) |
User level (>10 e-scooter uses before the accident) | 51 (60) |
Previous experience with motorcycle driving | 23 (27) |
Driver’s license | 51 (60) |
Helmet use | 10 (12) |
Facial injuries | |
Mandibular fracturesc | 66 (55) |
No. of injured patients | 36 (47) |
Type | |
Unifocal | 4 (72) |
Plurifocal | 22 (28) |
Site | |
Dentulous portion | 21 (32) |
Condylar process | 45 (68) |
Midface fractures | 53 (45) |
No. of injured patients | 43 (56) |
Site | |
Nasal bones | 20 (26) |
Zygoma | 13 (17) |
Occlusofacial fracture (Le Fort) | 4 (5) |
Orbital fracture | 7 (9) |
Craniofacial fractures | |
No. of injured patients | 7 (9) |
Site | |
Fronto-orbito-ethmoidal fracture | 1 (1) |
Frontal sinus | 7 (9) |
Facial wounds | 90 |
No. of injured patients | 78 (62) |
Site | |
Supraorbital rim/forehead | 16 (18) |
Nose | 10 (11) |
Cheek | 3 (3) |
Lips | 25 (28) |
Tongue | 1 (1) |
Chin | 36 (40) |
Dental trauma | 115 |
No. of injured patients | 55 (44) |
Type | |
Crown fractures | 69 (60) |
Dental dislocation | 40 (35) |
Alveolodental fractures | 6 (5) |
Site | |
Incisors | 92 (80) |
Other teeth | 23 20) |
Denominators to calculate percentages may vary according to available data retrieved from the questionnaire as well as the medical records.
Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the speed at time of the accident: low (<10 kph), medium (10-20 kph), and high (>20 kph).
Each mandibular site of fracture in a patient was recorded as 1 fracture.