Table 2. Applications of convolutional neural network on pluripotent stem cells studies since 2017.
Reference | Title | Objective | Methodology | Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kavitha et al (2017) | Deep vector-based convolutional neural network approach for automatic recognition of colonies of induced pluripotent stem cells | A V-CNN model is developed to distinguish colony characteristics based on extracted features of the iPSC colony | • A transfer function from the feature vectors to the virtual image was generated at the front of the CNN in order for classification of feature vectors of healthy and unhealthy colonies | • Precision, recall, and F-measure values of the V-CNN model were higher than the SVM classifier with a range of 87–93% |
• The performance of V-CNN model in distinguishing colonies was compared with the competitive SVM classifier based on morphological, textural, and combined features | • For the quality of colonies, the V-CNN model showed higher accuracy values based on morphological (95.5%), textural (91.0%), and combined (93.2%) features than those estimated with the SVM classifier (86.7, 83.3, and 83.4%, respectively) | |||
• Five-fold cross-validation was used to investigate the performance of the V-CNN model | • The accuracy of the feature sets using five-fold cross-validation was higher than 90% for the V-CNN model as compared to SVM that just yielded around 75–77% | |||
Fan et al (2017) | A Machine Learning Assisted, Label-free, Non-invasive Approach for Somatic Reprogramming in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Colony Formation Detection and Prediction | A computer vision system to recognize and assist the classification of induced pluripotent mouse embryonic stem cells colonies from microscopic images | • CNN is used as classifier to recognize colonies | • This algorithm shows no significant differences (Pearson coefficient r > 0.9) in detection and prediction of colonies in terms of biological features compared to manually processed colonies |
• Colonies are located and their boundaries are detected by a semi-supervised segmentation method | • Evaluation was completed by standard immunofluorescence staining, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (QPCR), and RNA-Seq for verification of pluripotency | |||
• Growth phase and maturation time window of colony formation was estimated with trained Hidden Markov Model (HMM) during the reprogramming procedure | ||||
• This system can predict the best selection time window for iPSC colonies to prevent random differentiation caused by overgrowth using data from colonies traced via time-lapse | ||||
Kusumoto et al (2018) | The application of CNN to stem cell biology | Recognition of iPSC-derived endothelial cells based on morphological features using CNN | • Images were collected at day 6 of differentiation | • The results proved that identification of iPSC-derived endothelial cells can be made based on morphology alone |
• 200 images were attained from each of four independent experiments and of these, 640 images were allocated for training and 160 were used for validation | ||||
• Under K-fold validation, three experiments that rendered 600 images were used for training phase and 200 images from one experiment were allocated for validation, in every possible combination | ||||
• CNN based LeNet and AlexNet model used | ||||
• F1 scores determined the performance, which indicated the aggregate of recall and precision, and on accuracy (portion of true predictions) | ||||
Waisman et al (2019) | Deep Learning Neural Networks Highly Predict Very Early Onset of Pluripotent Stem Cell Differentiation | Use CNNs to precisely forecast the beginning of PSC differentiation in transmitted light microscopy images | • Mouse ESCs were cultured in distinct conditions to maintain the ground state of pluripotency | • CNN model could be trained to recognize the ESCs from differentiating cells within 24–48 h with an outstanding accuracy higher than 99%. |
• Images were taken randomly through EVOS microscope at consecutive hours post differentiation | • This trained CNN was found to detect differentiating cells only minutes after the cells were stimulated to differentiate | |||
• Light microscopic images of pluripotent stem cells were used to train a CNN to distinguish pluripotent stem cells from early differentiating cells | • So far, this approach is the best cell assay for verifying differentiation in such a short timeframe, due to its accuracy (which is close to 100%) and low cost | |||
• CNN based ResNet and DenseNet model used | • The performance of the CNN in accurately identifying cellular morphology in microscopic images will definitely have substantial effects on the ways cell assays are conducted in the future. | |||
• 2134 images were selected for training and 400 for validation (200 in each group). Independent prediction after training phase was done with 100 images (50 per group) |
Notes.
- CNN
- convolutional neural network
- iPSC
- induced pluripotent stem cells
- ESC
- embryonic stem cell
- SVM
- support vector machine
- V-CNN
- vector-based convolutional neural network