Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 18;8:e10317. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10317

Table 2. Comparison of postoperative variables in groups with strong responders and weak responders.

1 year follow up variables Strong responders, n = 59a Weak responders, n = 30a
UPDRS Ib 2.2 (2.2) 4.5 (4.0)f
UPDRS I changec 0.4 (1.9) 1.5 (1.7)f
UPDRS IIb 8.4 (4.7) 12.3 (6.1)f
UPDRS II changec −2.8 (6.3) 5.6 (5.9)f
UPDRS III, on-medb 13.9 (7.5) 21.5 (11.9)f
UPDRS III changec −11.9 (11.6) 7.3 (8.5)f
UPDRS III, off-medd 20.9 (13.1) 25.7 (6.7)
UPDRS III changee −29.0 (13.8) −12.4 (14.4)f
UPDRS IVb 2.4 (2.2) 3.5 (2.6)f
UPDRS IV changec −4.1 (3.6) 0.1 (4.2)f
Fluency total categoriesb 33.8 (10.4) 33.4 (8.5)
Fluency total lettersb 31.2 (11.5) 31.8 (12.8)
Stroop interferenceb 75.6 (66.4) 79.0 (55.7)
LEDD 622 (511) 717 (501)
LEDD change −509 (472) −577 (529)
LEDD change (%) −40.7 (37.5) −42.2 (35.2)
TEED 145 (151) 112 (69)

Notes.

LEDD
levodopa equivalent daily dosage
off-/on-med
off-/on-medication
off-/on-stim
off-/on-stimulation
TEED
total electrical energy delivered
UPDRS
Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale
a

Mean (standard deviation)

b

On-stimulation, on-medication at one-year follow up

c

Difference between on-medication and on-stimulation vs. preoperative on-medication

d

On-stimulation and off-medication at one-year follow up

e

Difference between on-stimulation and off-medication vs. preoperative off-medication

f

Significant difference with p-value < 0.05, calculated with Mann Whitney-U test