Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020 Jun 13;47(13):2998–3007. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-04897-6

Table 2.

Region-based analyses: the mean, standard deviation (SD), and the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the regional standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) differences between various image types and the ground-truth images; Cohen's d effect sizes; area under the curves (AUC); 95% CI of the AUC difference between the DL-based methods and the ground truth.

Image Type Mean±SD, 95% CI Cohen’s d AUC 95% CI of difference AUC
Ground-truth 2.25 0.954 N/A
Method A 0.023±0.172) (−0.321, 0.367) 2.38 0.982 (−0.02, 0.08)
Method B −0.010±0.093 (−0.196, 0.176) 2.64 0.995 (−0.02, 0.10)
Method C −0.013±0.094 (−0.201, 0.175) 2.33 0.987 (−0.02, 0.09)
Method D −0.016±0.098 (−0.212, 0.180) 2.59 0.991 (−0.02, 0.09)
Low–count data −0.004±0.130 (−0.264, 0.256) 1.79 0.945 N/A

Network training methods: A-direct application of pre-trained network; B-transfer learning starting with pre-trained network; C-training new network from scratch; D-training new network with combined datasets