Table 4.
Mean and standard deviation (SD) image quality scores (1=uninterpretable; 2=poor; 3=adequate; 4=good; 5=excellent) and the proportion of high-quality images (scores 4–5) from the four readers.
Reader | Ground-truth | Method A | Method B | Method C | Method D | Low-count | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Mean±SD | 4.78±0.58 | 3.35±0.98 | 4.28±0.75 | 4.48±0.51 | 4.45±0.64 | 3.65±1.03 |
High-quality images (%) | 92.5 | 45 | 82.5 | 100 | 92.5 | 60 | |
2 | Mean±SD | 3.40±0.55 | 2.70±0.72 | 3.65±0.89 | 3.73±0.72 | 3.60±0.67 | 2.65±0.66 |
High-quality images (%) | 42.5 | 15 | 52.5 | 57.5 | 60 | 10 | |
3 | Mean±SD | 2.93±0.69 | 2.90±0.38 | 4.05±0.39 | 3.58±0.68 | 3.35±0.77 | 1.15±0.36 |
High-quality images (%) | 20 | 2.5 | 95 | 62.5 | 42.5 | 0 | |
4 | Mean±SD | 2.38±0.49 | 2.65±0.77 | 3.83±0.78 | 4.08±0.76 | 3.90±0.74 | 1.08±0.26 |
High-quality images (%) | 0 | 17.5 | 65 | 80 | 72.5 | 0 |
Network training methods: A-direct application of pre-trained network; B-transfer learning starting with pre-trained network; C-training new network from scratch; D-training new network with combined datasets