Skip to main content
. 2020 May 28;47(13):2968–2977. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-04864-1

Table 4.

Classification metrics of all tested models. Four radiomic models using different input features were compared with conventional measures. The respective performance metrics (Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), balanced accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV)) determined on the test set are reported

Model MCC Balanced accuracy Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV
LN short diameter 0.32 0.67 0.35 1.00 1.00 0.29
LN Volume 0.37 0.72 0.67 0.77 0.92 0.38
Expert rating 0.32 0.67 0.35 1.00 1.00 0.29
Radiomics-texture 0.30 0.68 0.73 0.62 0.88 0.38
Radiomics-shape 0.37 0.73 0.61 0.85 0.94 0.37
Radiomics-intensity 0.25 0.57 0.98 0.15 0.81 0.67
Radiomics-LBP 0.74 0.84 0.98 0.69 0.92 0.9
Radiomics-combined 0.64 0.73 1.00 0.46 0.88 1.00