Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 1;109(1):16–30. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v109i1.6677

Table 3.

Mean (95% CI) difference between groups, mean (95% CI) difference between groups adjusted for baseline score, difference in proportion (95% CI) of patients who reached MCID and difference in proportion (95% CI) of patients who reached MCID adjusted for baseline score

Outcome Difference between groups Difference between groups, adjusted for baseline score Difference in proportion of patients who reach MCID Difference in proportion of patients who reach MCID, adjusted for baseline score
T1 minus Baseline T1 minus Baseline Odds Ratio Odds Ratio
GPR minus MT GPR minus MT GPR vs MT GPR vs MT
VAS -12.4
(-19.7; -5.1)
-8.6
(-13.3; -3.8)
1.99
(0.94; 4.19)
1.84
(0.85; 3.99)
NDI-I -2.2
(-3.9; -0.5)
-1.5
(-2.8; -0.1)
2.29
(1.20; 4.39)
2.13
(1.05; 4.35)
TSK -2.5
(-4.3; -0.6)
1.8
(-3.2; -0.3)
- -
TSK 1 -0.5
(-1.5; 0.5)
-0.4
(-1.2; 0.4)
- -
TSK 2 -2.0
(-3.1; -0.9)
-1.4
(-2.2; -0.5)
- -
ROM Flexion and Extension 7.2
(2.8; 11.6)
5.6
(1.8; 9.3)
- -
ROM Lateral Flexion 2.7
(-0.8; 6.3)
2.0
(-1.3; 5.3)
- -
ROM Rotation -0.9
(-4.7; 2.9)
-0.8
(-4.2; 2.5)
- -

GPR=Global Postural Reeducation group, MT=Manual Therapy group, VAS=Visual Analog Scale, NDI-I=Neck Disability Index, TSK=Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, TSK 1=TSK activity avoidance subscale, TSK 2=TSK harm subscale, ROM=Range of Motion