Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 23.
Published in final edited form as: Urology. 2019 Nov 9;137:108–114. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.10.014

Table 2.

Comparison of patients whose RP contained any foci of ductal carcinoma (PDA) with those with pure acinar adenocarcinoma (PAA)

Grade Group, CI 95%, P Value PDA (n = 128) PAA (n = 901) P Value
Age, mean, years (range) GG2-GG5 64.9 (40–85) 62.5 (40–85) <.001
GG2 63.4 61.2 .21
GG3 64.9 63.6 .39
GG4–5 65.6 64.6 .41
PSA, ng/ml (range) GG2-GG5 11.6 (1–106) 9.7 (.3–181.9) .1
PSAD, gn/ml/gr GG2-GG5 0.25 (.03–1.31) .22 (.1–3.12) .2
Extensive bilateral disease (%) GG2-GG5, 20/128 (15.6%) 54/901 (6%) <.001
GG2 2/21 (9.5%) 13/473 (2.8%) .13
GG3 5/37 (13.5%) 12/174 (6.9%) .18
GG4–5 13/70 (18.6%) 29/254 (11.4%) .16
Regional lymph lode metastasis GG2-GG5 8/127 (6.3%) 24/900 (2.7%) .049
GG2 0/21 0/472 N/A
GG3 4/37 (11.1%) 6/174(3.4%) .73
GG4–5 4/70 (5.7%) 17/254 (6.7%) 1.0
Grade group distribution GG2 21 (16.4%) 473 (52.5) <.001
GG3 37 (28.9%) 174 (19.3%)
GG4 7 (5.5%) 29 (3.2%)
GG5 63 (49.2%) 225 (25.0%)
Prostate weight, mean, grams (range) GG2-GG5 (range) 51.5 (19–171) 48.1 (13.5–260) .14
Number of tumor nodules, mean (range) GG2-GG5(range) 2.6 (1–6) 2.7 (1–7) .09

PSA, prostate-specific antigen; PSAD, PSA density; RP, radical prostatectomy; SD, standard deviation.