Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 2;117(46):29063–29068. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2013694117

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Simulated pairs of populations with stronger interactions have weaker use–resistance associations. (A) Each filled circle represents a simulated population. When spillover is weak (i.e., d0, measured in arbitrary length units, is small), populations fall along an idealized use–resistance association (dashed black line). As spillover is increased, the cross-sectional use–resistance association becomes weaker and has greater variance. Gray lines show the simple linear regression best fit. (B) Each open circle represents a pair of the populations shown in the corresponding facet in A. For amounts of spillover, all pairs have the same use–resistance association Δρτ (i.e., 1, the slope of the dashed black line in A). For stronger spillover, there is substantial variance in the associations. For nonzero spillover (d0 > 10−6), stronger-interacting pairs have weaker use–resistance associations (Spearman’s ρ; SI Appendix, Table S2). The red line shows the robust regression best fit. The vertical axis is truncated for visual clarity.