Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 9;10:564248. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.564248

Table 3.

Associations between S100A8 expression and clinical pathological characteristics Sensitivity analysis.

Clinicopathological characteristics No. of studies No. of patients Risk of high S100A8 OR (95% CI) Significant Z P-value Heterogeneity I2 (%) P-value Model
Gender (male vs female) 4 339 1.93 (0.76–4.89) 1.39 0.164 65.0 0.036 Random effect
Tumor differentiation (poor vs moderate/well) 5 439 3.91 (1.48–10.27) 2.76 0.006 73.4 0.005 Random effect
TNM stage (III–IV vs I–II) 4 402 1.34 (0.51–3.51) 0.59 0.554 69.2 0.021 Random effect
Lymphatic metastasis (N1/N2/N3 vs N0) 5 448 1.80 (1.17–2.77) 2.68 0.007 0.0 0.445 Fixed effect
ER (positive vs negative) 3 319 0.31 (0.21–0.47) 5.71 0.000 0.0 0.443 Fixed effect
PR (positive vs negative) 3 319 0.29 (0.13–0.63) 3.14 0.002 58.5 0.090 Random effect
HER2 (positive vs negative) 3 319 1.91 (0.62–5.91) 1.12 0.263 75.8 0.016 Random effect