Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 23;15(11):e0242134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242134

Table 3. Study 1 baseline vs. follow up: Percentages of participants in the intervention and control groups who demonstrated each handwashing behaviour and whose responses included “germs”.

Measure Baseline Follow McNemar Test
χ2 p mid-p Estimated Odds
% (n) % (n) Ratio (CI)
Intervention Group (n = 101)
Soap 55% (56) 61% (62) 1.25 0.26 0.19 1.86 (0.69, 5.50)
Rub 70% (71) 67% (68) 0.12 0.73 0.61 0.83 (0.39, 1.75)
Wrists 4% (4) 16% (16) 8.64 0.003 0.001 13.00 (1.95, 552.47)
Fingers 11% (11) 29% (29) 9.63 0.002 < 0.001 4.00 (1.59, 11.96)
Nails 1% (1) 10% (10) 5.82 0.02 0.006 10.00 (1.42, 433.98)
Dry 78% (79) 84% (85) 0.96 0.33 0.25 1.60 (0.68, 3.94)
Knowledge 35% (35) 65% (66) 24.32 < 0.001 < 0.001 11.33 (3.56, 57.67)
Control Group (n = 92)
Soap 61% (56) 57% (52) 0.50 0.48 0.36 0.64 (0.21, 1.80)
Rub 65% (60) 70% (64) 0.45 0.50 0.38 1.50 (0.56, 4.23)
Wrists 4% (4) 4% (4) 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (0.19, 5.37)
Fingers 16% (15) 16% (15) 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (0.35, 2.84)
Nails 1% (1) 0% (0) 0.00 1.00 0.50 0.00 (0.00, 39.00)
Dry 83% (76) 86% (79) 0.24 0.63 0.48 1.43 (0.49, 4.42)
Knowledge 47% (43) 52% (48) 0.64 0.42 0.33 1.50 (0.63, 3.73)

The analyses compare baseline and follow up measures within each group.