Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 18;6(11):e05529. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05529

Table 2.

Thermal stability data for the neat PAM, neat CNC, and PAM/CNC composite films with different CNC content.

Sample Primary mass loss
1st degradation stage
2nd degradation stage
Entire mass loss, %
Тon, °С Тmax,
°С
Mass loss, % Тon, °С Тmax,
°С
Mass loss, % Тon, °С Тmax,
°С
Mass loss, %
PАM - 56 11.9 223.6 235.7 4.0 359.6 382.5 59.5 86.5
307.0 11.1
PАM/CNC-4.6 - 68.8 11.9 224.7 236.2 3.2 353.5 374.5 56.1 82.7
298.8 11.5
PАM/CNC-10.3 - 66.3 11.8 228.1 235.6 3.1 353.8 375.0 54.4 80.2
291.8 10.9
PАM/CNC-15.2 - 70.6 10.9 228.5 237.8 3.4 338.1 352.9 18.7 76.0
283.0 10.1 381.3 32.9
PАM/CNC-19.7 - 69.7 11.1 230.8 242.6 4.2 337.1 350.3 19.8 76.1
286.5 9.1 380.5 31.9
PАM/CNC-29.8 - 57.8 10.3 234.0 243.4 4.0 334.5 351.5 27.2 74.1
285.3 5.6 381.4 27.0
РАM/CNC-40.1 - 70.5 9.5 234.9 243.1 5.3 318.9 348.5 27.8 74.1
286.1 1.0 374.0 30.5
PАM/CNC-50.3 - 76.5 8.2 236.9 246.9 4.8 304.8 341.6 29.8 67.2
385.8 24.4
CNC - 58.8 4.3 - 285.5 38.6 - 355.6 26.6 69.5