Table 1.
TP53 variant1 | Activity2 | Occurrence in UMD3 | Position in the TP53 gene | Potential loss of function | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score according to Kato et al.4 | Score according to Kotler et al.5 | Score according to Giacomelli et al.6 | ||||
p.E224D | 0.91 | 0.65 | 0.56 | 48 | Last Base Exon | Splice variant |
p.V218G | 0.86 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 35 | Exon | Differential loss of activity in yeast and mammalian cells |
p.G187S | 0.72 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 34 | Exon | Splice variant |
p.A138V | 0.67 | 0.13 | 0.35 | 126 | Exon | Thermosensitive; differential loss of activity in yeast and mammalian cells |
p.S106R | 0.51 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 39 | Exon | RNA destabilization; possible splicing defect |
p.R181H | 0.44 | 0.61 | 0.50 | 77 | Exon | Position 181 is known to impair TP53 for specific functions7 |
p.R181C | 0.40 | 0.65 | 0.58 | 103 | Exon |
1The sequence nomenclature used for TP53 variants in this work is in accordance with the Human Genome Variation Society's guidelines using the NM_000546.5 transcript sequence and the full-length protein NP_000537.3.
2TP53 functional data were scaled in the range of 0 to 1 with 0 corresponding to the lowest activity of TP53 variants.
3Number of tumors expressing each TP53 variant included in the TP53_UMD.
4Data from the transcriptional activity performed in yeast using 8 different p53 response elements (mean of the activities for the 8 readouts) from the work of Kato et al.9.
5Score from the growth arrest assay in H1299 cells performed by Kotler et al.11.
6Mean score from the three assays performed by Gacomelli et al.12 (see "Methods" for a full description of the assays).
7Both in vitro studies and mouse models indicate that these variants are functionally defective21,32.