Table 4.
Measurement Model | B (SE) | β | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|
CU → Callousness | 1.00 (.00) | .76 | [1.00, 1.00]*** |
CU → Uncaring | 1.11 (.26) | .53 | [.61, 1.61]*** |
CU → Unemotional | 1.18 (.28) | .60 | [.63, 1.74]*** |
Mediation Model | B (SE) | β | 95% CI |
CAN → CU | .59 (.20) | .27 | [.20, .98]** |
CU → Alcohol | .62 (.30) | .23 | [.04, 1.20]* |
CU → Drug | .56 (.19) | .35 | [.18, .94]** |
CAN → Alcohol | −.09 (.51) | −.02 | [−1.09, .91] |
CAN → Drug | −.21 (.32) | −.06 | [−.83, .42] |
Covariates | |||
Minority → Alcohol | −2.73 (.86) | −.26 | [−4.41, −1.05]*** |
Gender → Alcohol | −2.23 (1.18) | −.17 | [−4.54, .07] |
Minority → Drug | −.78 (.54) | −.12 | [−1.83, .27] |
Gender → Drug | −.13 (.74) | −.02 | [−1.58, 1.32] |
Gender → CU | −1.79 (.45) | −.37 | [−2.67, −.91]*** |
Moderated Mediation Model | B (SE) | β | 95% CI |
CAN → CU | .68 (.19) | .34 | [.32, 1.05]*** |
CU → Alcohol | 1.14 (.61) | .44 | [−.05, 2.34] |
ΔHRV → Alcohol | −.50 (.68) | −.14 | [−1.82, .82] |
CU*ΔHRV → Alcohol | −.33 (.29) | −.17 | [−.89, .24] |
CAN → Alcohol | −.40 (.56) | −.08 | [−1.40, .69] |
CU → Drug | 1.17 (.46) | .67 | [.27, 2.06]* |
ΔHRV → Drug | −.99 (.37) | −.42 | [−1.73, −.25]** |
CU*ΔHRV → Drug | −.39 (.15) | −.29 | [−.68, −.09]* |
CAN → Drug | −.08 (.36) | −.02 | [−.78, .62] |
Covariates | |||
Minority → Alcohol | −2.08 (.79) | −.22 | [−3.62, −.54]** |
Gender → Alcohol | −2.08 (1.45) | −.17 | [−4.95, .80] |
Minority → Drug | −.65 (.55) | −.10 | [−1.73, .42] |
Gender → Drug | −.27 (.95) | −.03 | [−2.13, 1.60] |
Gender → CU | −1.67 (.57) | −.35 | [−2.78, −.56]** |
Conditional Indirect Effect | |||
CAN → CU*ΔHRV → Drug | −.26 (.13) | −.11 | [−.55, −.05]* |
ΔHRV Residualized change score of heart rate variability; CAN Child abuse and neglect; CU Callous-unemotional traits; SE Standard Error; CI Confidence Interval for unstandardized coefficients.
* p < .05; ** p < .01; *** p < .001. Gender was coded as 0 = Male, 1 = Female