Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 23;7:67. doi: 10.1186/s40658-020-00330-x

Table 6.

Comparison of Ki between the estimated IFs

Number of subjects IDIF sPBIFAUC sPBIFiDV sPBIFPLAS
15–45 min 30–60 min 45–75 min 60–90 min Shiozaki et al. [8] Vriens et al. [10] This study
n = 10a R2 0.99 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.97 0.96 0.97 0.99
Bias − 9% 3% − 1% − 6% − 14% − 8% 12% 3% 2%
SD 10% 8% 8% 8% 9% 9% 11% 9% 6%
n = 12 R2 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.98 0.97 0.97 0.99
Bias − 16% 4% 0% − 6% − 13% − 9% 11% 2% 3%
SD 20% 9% 9% 8% 9% 11% 13% 12% 6%

aTwo scans with the lowest Ki values were removed